Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > > My Blog |
Member Deleted Post
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
|
I have noticed more married men on the blogs complaining. I don't think they are complaining on Ashley Madison. Might be a better match for them there.
| ||
|
Well said hun AGREED!!!!
| ||
9/13/2018 5:50 pm |
I have noticed more married men on the blogs complaining. I don't think they are complaining on Ashley Madison. Might be a better match for them there.
| ||
|
Very well said. I am constantly being told that because I wont see a married man that I have a problem. No asshat, its not a problem...its a preference. Very well said. Thank you
| ||
|
No worries. I have the latest Sony, scratch and sniff and push and taste phone... It's all good... I broke my last one as I tried to penetrate the screen... No worries... Thank goodness for phone insurance... ... is there another way to look at it Going Too Fucking Far NEW Blog Features RevealeD O O A Foolproof Method Posted Over on that NEW site O O
| ||
|
LOL, that was spot on.. From a guy that was in lousy marriage...(13 years happily divorced now), who jokes that the longest I went without sex after middle school, was when I was married. If you're not happy with who you have, grow a set of balls, get a divorce and move on. Don't just come on here bitching because all the ladies don't see it from your point of view, and want none of the drama that comes with your infidelities. " I refuse to belong to any organization that would accept me as a member" Groucho Marx
| ||
|
Does Ashley Madison site still exist? I thought they had a major security breach?
| ||
|
Omg .. married men are the most annoying on this site . Geeeeeez . Not everyone wants to share a dick with a wife. Uuuuugggh sometimes i have to stay calm and watch how i respond to the nagging married men .
| ||
|
I have noticed more married men on the blogs complaining. I don't think they are complaining on Ashley Madison. Might be a better match for them there. It was about how how crackers stole the site's server source code. (I'm not sure whether it was the same crack as the one where user data were stolen or a separate intrusion.) The cracker didn't know what to do with it, but released it somewhere. Curious software people read the code, and discovered that a whole lot of it was dedicated to maintaining fake women's profiles -- having the fakes write to real male users to tempt them into paying for the service. The language in the fake-bot communications was more than just a collection of stock lines, but less sophisticated than a chat-bot. It varied response times to look more like real people. It even tried to show time on-line to be consistent with the messages from the fake-bots, but there were bugs, so sometimes users would get messages time stamped yesterday from fake-bots with profiles that said last on-line last week. Oops! Apparently more than 99% of women's profiles there are fakes. But the few real women apparently have a great time if they can sort through the abundance of guys who are not getting any action from the fake-bots. But the article said that the users most likely to have good results on the site were gay men, even though the site doesn't advertise to them and only barely supports same-sex users. (Now that I think about the parts of the article that said whose results were favorable there, I am inclined to guess that the source code theft was from the same intrusion that stole the user data. Without user records, how would they be able to analyze who was getting what they wanted there? This site is such a pain from my phone. I really need to fix my desktop.
|
Become a member to create a blog